🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam decision, the highest judicial body permitted Texas to implement a redrawn congressional district plan that could add up to five additional conservative-tilting districts. The six-to-three ruling, released on Thursday, upholds a petition by the state to lift a district court's injunction that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Court's Rationale

The district court erroneously placed itself into an ongoing primary campaign, causing much confusion and disrupting the delicate equilibrium in elections, the supreme court said in detailing its action.

That lower court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely grouped voters according to their race – a method known as illegal race-based districting – when it passed the redistricting plan. It had ordered the state to use the maps established after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Strong Dissenting Opinion

In a forcefully written dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's decision. She contended that it disrespected the work of the lower court, observing that its opinion was crafted by a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan wrote in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced partisan advantage, will govern next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be sorted in electoral districts because of their race. And that result, as this court has stated consistently, is a violation of the constitution.

National Redistricting Battle

The court's action is part of a nationwide fight over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is an essential part in campaigns to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican majority. Ordinarily, map-drawing occurs after a new decade's census. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier this year set off a wave among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also passed new maps that are estimated to yield a number of more conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have responded with new maps in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Partisan Responses

The Texas AG praised the High Court's decision. In a statement, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes aligned with the GOP. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

In contrast, Democratic representatives lamented the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major party campaign committee.

A leading Democratic leader argued the court had once again eroded its legitimacy by approving a racially gerrymandered map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.