🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Not the typical entrepreneur. Nor the typical employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – seems like it requires advanced expertise in healthcare.

Our Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

Based on recent research, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). Typical company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes regarding subsidies that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making average wages must contribute about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute about 13.75%.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast that with what average US resident spends. I can name dozens of businesses who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that with inclusive programs, these contributions also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection in addition to funding healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

For America, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like many federal military, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

Universal healthcare coverage would be a huge benefit for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field with our larger competitors that can pay for superior coverage. It would render administration significantly simpler (a payroll deduction processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and ineffective) process of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage among workers – as opposed to the current system where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as they get. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. Given rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. I understand that we're not a compact European nation where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would still be a superior and more affordable strategy both for managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. The US places significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.